The City Council is facing the “toughest budget debates for decades.” Up to 200 million euros and revenue allocations break away Nuremberg 2010. A new savings package over 50 million euros was necessary, according to the SPD. Taxes should not give it yet.
Summer vacation, Parliament break election: How might quite well from the council and at City Hall still not to the future of the budget figures for 2010 do. Perhaps it is also that all the guess: This time, and so it has more often been in previous years, said that it is as bad as ever. Only this time it seems really “the most difficult budget deliberations in decades” to be as SPD Chief Gebhard Schönfelder formulated.
200 million less
He knows the most important figures in which his friend and party treasurer Harald Riedel has previously prepared. Schönfelder quantifies the tax shortfall for the coming year to “at least” 60 million euros. The key assignments of the Free State from the tax would apply to Nuremberg to present plans fell by 60 to 100 million decrease.
He also believes that the levy to the district by 25 million euros will be higher. Power up to 185 million euros less in the city coffers. “It can even be up to 200 million euros,” continues Schönfelder noch eins drauf.
Taxes are not increased
The Chef Group: “If no external assistance will remain the only way into more debt and consolidation.” Riedel With financial officer, he agreed that taxes are not increased, but a new savings package over 50 million euro is required. Concrete is not called them.
It operates the city council nor the last package on the nearly identical amount. Just yesterday Riedel met with external consultants, the firm Rödl & Partner, which alone at least seven million euros from the administration to get to.
“Seriousness of the situation is not recognized”
Schönfelder, the first results skeptical, cites as an example the optimization of the lighting in the city. Riedel, however, is optimistic and recognize a lot of ideas for a “streamlining of the administration.” “This will be an important approach for us to save,” says the chief treasurer. “The city has over the years spent too much money in good times and not for bad provision. Now we have no more reserves. “Like his predecessor had also been demanded.
That it becomes difficult again 50 million euros to save shows itself in miniature that recent savings decisions hardly implemented. Schönfelder and Riedel mentioned the voluntary services provided by three percent, or 450,000 euros are to be reduced. The SPD chief: “Some speakers have the seriousness of the situation is not yet recognized.” He cites Julia Lehner (culture) and Roland Fleck (economics), both CSU.
Free State has an obligation
The Social Democrats also see the Free State in particular. “We need an equitable burden sharing,” says Riedel. The State Government should ensure that key assignments do not fall. The Treasurer: “It can not be that the Free State as a model without new boy off debt, while federal and local authorities must continue to borrow.”

No comments yet.